• If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Quick Detailer Burning Question

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Quick Detailer Burning Question

    Meguiar's has a confusing list of seemingly similar products that is very hard to sort out. So I'm coming to the horse's mouth for the definitive answer. :-)

    I imagine that with your expanding line of quick detailer's that for some functions it wouldn't matter which one you used. Such as claying lubricant or QD'ing over a carnuba finish. However, what I need to know is that if you use a polymer or acrylic based synthetic finish, which one would be safe to use so that the synthetic can be reapplied? What I'm getting at is that, sure you can put any carnuba over a synthetic, but then you have to strip it all down to reapply the synthetic again because the carnuba would prevent the syn from bonding to the paint.

    Again, which QD'r would be used to maintain a sterile surface in conjunction with polishes and paint cleaners?

  • #2
    I think #34 FI would be your best bet.

    Comment


    • #3
      Hi Steve,

      I understand your question and have seen questions like this before.

      Here's what I think.

      A quality wax, whether it is a natural, synthetic, or blended product will adhere to a properly prepared finish. I think to the degree that any product already on the surface would interfere with this adhering process would be nominal to the point that no one could tell the difference in a side-by-side test of a chemically cleaned surface versus a surface as you describe.

      Would there be a difference? Maybe, but not enough to make a difference. This entire subject is really focusing on the minors, not the majors. Again, this applies to a quality product. The quality of some products, (read as the technology behind them), handicap them from adhering really well in the first place.

      I've been detailing cars for over 15 years, (longer than some, not as long as others), I prefer to stay within one company's line of products because the chemist who make the products understand the chemistry involved with the formulas and can therefore insure compatibility. I'm a real system kind of guy, so that's what works for me.

      I think a quality wax is going to adhere to the paint as long as the paint is properly prepared. If wiping the finish down with a quick detailer is part of the process, then the product should adhere.

      For example:

      Final Inspection is body shop safe. This means there are no ingredients in this formula that will adversely affect surface adhesion.

      Last Touch contains some ingredients that are not body shop safe, this product is not recommended for use in a body shop environment. Same thing applies to Quik Detailer.

      What I'm saying is, if you use a quality wax, and apply it over a car's finish after using either of these two products, a quality product is going to adhere equally well regardless of which quick detailer was used.

      That said, if you want to take things to the extreme, then #34 Final Inspection would probably be the best choice as it is body shop safe.


      1. What's the difference between Quik Detailer, (A-33) and Final Inspection, (M-34)?


      Hope this helps...

      Mike
      Mike Phillips
      760-515-0444
      showcargarage@gmail.com

      "Find something you like and use it often"

      Comment


      • #4
        bump
        Mike Phillips
        760-515-0444
        showcargarage@gmail.com

        "Find something you like and use it often"

        Comment

        Working...
        X
        gtag('config', 'UA-161993-8');