Tweet
M82 cut rating is...
a #4 on the scale,is this the level of cut before or after abrasives diminish?
Dan
Dan
- If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
-
-
Re: M82 cut rating is...
Before...2017 Subaru WRX Premium - WR Blue -
Re: M82 cut rating is...
So if I stick to working in 2x2 sections and work this product with a DA a fair amount of time to allow the abrasives to diminish is it safe to say I will get better results then I would with M205 which uses SMAT technology?Comment
-
Re: M82 cut rating is...
Better can mean different things..
But generally I would side with the #205.
The SMAT basically lets the product remove the "#4 scale defects" in this example, but the abrasives are so small (micro) that they dont leave their own marks behind.
Whereas the DAT abrasives can remove the "#4 scale defects", yet will leave their own marks behind. Then the product breaks down to remove the marks it created.
Keep in mind the scale is general, dont get too tied up in it.2017 Subaru WRX Premium - WR BlueComment
-
Re: M82 cut rating is...
Very, very well said.Originally posted by Murr1525 View Post
M82 vs M205 can be a bit of a tough call, and in the end it's probably going to come down to the paint itself and how you see things. M205 may do more for the overall clarity of newer factory metallic paints, however.Michael Stoops
Senior Global Product & Training Specialist | Meguiar's Inc.
Remember, this hobby is supposed to be your therapy, not the reason you need therapy.
Comment
Comment