Hi
I have read somewhere that the original PC/G100 may not be powerful enough to break down the diminishing abrasives in Meg's 9/82/80/83 which means that it may leave micro marring of the surface..is this true? Or does it depend on the car's clearcoat and the pads used??
If using the PC/G100 for a 2 stage process ..would using Megs 205 on a yellow pad (since the abrasives are uniform) be better for correction as opposed to the ones with diminishing abrasives? Of course the last step would be NXT 2.0 on a tan pad.
The car to correct would be a 2009 Honda with Charcoal gray metallic paint.
thx
I have read somewhere that the original PC/G100 may not be powerful enough to break down the diminishing abrasives in Meg's 9/82/80/83 which means that it may leave micro marring of the surface..is this true? Or does it depend on the car's clearcoat and the pads used??
If using the PC/G100 for a 2 stage process ..would using Megs 205 on a yellow pad (since the abrasives are uniform) be better for correction as opposed to the ones with diminishing abrasives? Of course the last step would be NXT 2.0 on a tan pad.
The car to correct would be a 2009 Honda with Charcoal gray metallic paint.
thx
Comment