We're all Meguiar's brothers (and sisters) here, and product comparisons don't get too ugly here, but on some other forums, the product wars DO get downright ugly. It has occurred to me that we laymen really can only do a subjective analysis of "wax" durability, which makes some of the acrimony on other sites pretty ludicrous.
Obviously, the chemists must do some sort of objective comparison when developing products, to know if they are making improvements.
Might you be able to let us in on how this is done? Since it has been stated that the remaining product on the surface after buff-off might be almost atoms thick, this sounds like a tough job.
Many people use water beading as an indicator, but it has been stated that some Meguiar's products (and others) tend to sheet rather than bead, so this wouldn't be a good indicator.
Just wondering.
Obviously, the chemists must do some sort of objective comparison when developing products, to know if they are making improvements.
Might you be able to let us in on how this is done? Since it has been stated that the remaining product on the surface after buff-off might be almost atoms thick, this sounds like a tough job.
Many people use water beading as an indicator, but it has been stated that some Meguiar's products (and others) tend to sheet rather than bead, so this wouldn't be a good indicator.
Just wondering.
Comment