Hi everyone,
My online supplier sells Meguires and Dodo Juice products, but for some reason he seems to completely misunderstand how Meguiars products work and he keeps pushing the Dodo products. I've been struggling for some time to explain to him how Meguiars products work, but he continues to spread misinformation on a major Australian forum that he sponsors. The pattern is the same. First he criticises Meguiars products, and then recommends a Dodo product.
For example, in a thread about Dodo Lime Prime vs Scratch X, he said:
"ScratchX is full of fillers and light chemical cleaning agents. It will remove some light marks but will only fill scratches. It is designed to be locked in with a synthetic product over the top (think Tech wax). In my opinion it’s useless and I wouldn’t use it if you gave it to me."
Then he said this:
"The funny thing is, Meguiar’s are releasing ScratchX-2 and SwirlX here in Aus on the 1/7/09 (it’s already available in the USA). Now what does scratchX-2 do that scratchX does not? If it already removes scratches why does it need to be superseded? And if it removes scratches why release a product to remove swirls which are lighter marks and would be removed in the same process…? With enough marketing budget you can sell anything"
Then the conversation tuned to Ultimate Compound:
"Why do they sell all their other similar products if this truly the ultimate??? In fact this retails cheaper than Meg's ScratchX 2.0 in the USA ($9.95 v $10.99) so why would they sell scratchX? It simply doesn't make sense. It smells like a lot of marketing hype and inferior products to me but at the end of the day, you are the consumer!"
Its really starting to frustrate me because the detailing section of this forum was previously not sponsored and people could share information without fearing being reprimanded by a heavy-handed sponsor.
Why is he allowed to sell Meguiars products if he is actively criticising them on a major automotive forum in australia (probably THE largest auto forum in australia)?
My online supplier sells Meguires and Dodo Juice products, but for some reason he seems to completely misunderstand how Meguiars products work and he keeps pushing the Dodo products. I've been struggling for some time to explain to him how Meguiars products work, but he continues to spread misinformation on a major Australian forum that he sponsors. The pattern is the same. First he criticises Meguiars products, and then recommends a Dodo product.
For example, in a thread about Dodo Lime Prime vs Scratch X, he said:
"ScratchX is full of fillers and light chemical cleaning agents. It will remove some light marks but will only fill scratches. It is designed to be locked in with a synthetic product over the top (think Tech wax). In my opinion it’s useless and I wouldn’t use it if you gave it to me."
Then he said this:
"The funny thing is, Meguiar’s are releasing ScratchX-2 and SwirlX here in Aus on the 1/7/09 (it’s already available in the USA). Now what does scratchX-2 do that scratchX does not? If it already removes scratches why does it need to be superseded? And if it removes scratches why release a product to remove swirls which are lighter marks and would be removed in the same process…? With enough marketing budget you can sell anything"
Then the conversation tuned to Ultimate Compound:
"Why do they sell all their other similar products if this truly the ultimate??? In fact this retails cheaper than Meg's ScratchX 2.0 in the USA ($9.95 v $10.99) so why would they sell scratchX? It simply doesn't make sense. It smells like a lot of marketing hype and inferior products to me but at the end of the day, you are the consumer!"
Its really starting to frustrate me because the detailing section of this forum was previously not sponsored and people could share information without fearing being reprimanded by a heavy-handed sponsor.
Why is he allowed to sell Meguiars products if he is actively criticising them on a major automotive forum in australia (probably THE largest auto forum in australia)?
Comment