In Autopia, some members believe fillers = oils.
Also some believe meg's concept of pure polish (which is pure TS oil) is similar to Autopian concept of a glaze (that is without abrasives but mostly fillers)
#83 and #80 contains megs TS oils which is also present in megs glazes i.e. #7, #5, #81, etc.
Does it mean that #83 and #80 contain TS oils which are fillers? Or Autopians were just heading in the wrong direction with this belief?
How to reconcile the not so irreconcilable difference?
Is it correct to conclude that, #83 and #80 have abrasives in them and at the same time contain fillers because of the TS oils?
I'm really confused when some Autopians say that #83 and #80 have fillers where in fact there's nothing to fill because the swirls have already been cut through the paint?
See my point?
What then is the use of the TS oils which they believe are just fillers? Isn't for lubrication only and not intended to fill?
Also some believe meg's concept of pure polish (which is pure TS oil) is similar to Autopian concept of a glaze (that is without abrasives but mostly fillers)
#83 and #80 contains megs TS oils which is also present in megs glazes i.e. #7, #5, #81, etc.
Does it mean that #83 and #80 contain TS oils which are fillers? Or Autopians were just heading in the wrong direction with this belief?
How to reconcile the not so irreconcilable difference?
Is it correct to conclude that, #83 and #80 have abrasives in them and at the same time contain fillers because of the TS oils?
I'm really confused when some Autopians say that #83 and #80 have fillers where in fact there's nothing to fill because the swirls have already been cut through the paint?
See my point?
What then is the use of the TS oils which they believe are just fillers? Isn't for lubrication only and not intended to fill?
Comment