d151 paint reconditioning cream vs mg66 quick detailer

[carsmetic]

new to the forum, long long time detailer. lately i've been using mg66 quick detailer as a one step product with a da or rotary and a polish pad. Getting great results, just read some reviews of the paint reconditioning cream. I am under the impression it is a newer product and I was hoping members here could enlighten me on the differences in them and the durability of them.
TIA

[Tuck91]

Re: d151 paint reconditioning cream vs mg66 quick detailer

I have both & I much prefer M66 over D151.

While D151 may have the advantage of having more cut, its hard to apply/remove & is way too thick and is just a pain to handle.

M66 is much easier to apply/remove & has a nice long smooth buffing cycle. Its great for clearing up light to moderate oxidation & light marring.

I have used gallons of M66 & I believe the old stuff is superior.

This is just my opinion though, others may favor D151.

[greg0303]

Re: d151 paint reconditioning cream vs mg66 quick detailer

They are both great all in one products.

D151 offers more cut and it can also be used as a 2-step product: just switch to less aggressive buffing pad in step 2. Paint Reconditioning Cream is like M86 Cut & Polish Cream with protection (wax). It uses SMA Technology and some detailers used it with microfiber discs successfully.

Here are some pics after 1-step buffing using D151:

http://meguiarsonline.com/forums/showthread.php?t=47940&highlight=Paint+Reconditioning+Cream

Maybe get a sample size first (ADS has it) to see if PRC meets your detailing needs.

[carsmetic]

Re: d151 paint reconditioning cream vs mg66 quick detailer

thanks for the replies.

FWIW, Since getting the meg da mf compound and pad, if I have to 2 step something, there would have to be a real good reason for me not to use 300 and mf pad for step 1.

so far this combo is easy and works.