Hello,
I am trying to fix my cars paint defects with what I have on hand. The car is a white 2001 Ford Escape. It appears the paint is very hard and does not respond that well to UC with polishing pad. I used my DA on speed 5 with a lot of down pressure with slow, controlled movements. I did about 6 passes in a small area on the hood. The paint deffenately looks cleaner and shinier from the UC, but the fine scratches and swirls still show.
I told my wife I may need to go more aggressive on her car, but I need to spend about $100 on a DA MF system. This is the perfect justification to buying this system, my wife would not approve spending that money otherwise lol. However, I do have a cutting pad that I've never used. Do you all think using the cutting pad with UC would be more aggressive than the MF DA system? If its less aggressive then I will try this method first. Thanks!
I am trying to fix my cars paint defects with what I have on hand. The car is a white 2001 Ford Escape. It appears the paint is very hard and does not respond that well to UC with polishing pad. I used my DA on speed 5 with a lot of down pressure with slow, controlled movements. I did about 6 passes in a small area on the hood. The paint deffenately looks cleaner and shinier from the UC, but the fine scratches and swirls still show.
I told my wife I may need to go more aggressive on her car, but I need to spend about $100 on a DA MF system. This is the perfect justification to buying this system, my wife would not approve spending that money otherwise lol. However, I do have a cutting pad that I've never used. Do you all think using the cutting pad with UC would be more aggressive than the MF DA system? If its less aggressive then I will try this method first. Thanks!
Comment