Ceramic bead booster VS Ceramic detailer
Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Ceramic bead booster VS Ceramic detailer

          
  1. #1
    Registered Member Jonesey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Age
    51
    Posts
    157
    Rep Power
    16

    Ceramic bead booster VS Ceramic detailer

    I've just about finished detailing my 2001 M3, Carbon Black (which is really dark blue) and will soon be doing my 2015 Black 535. I've used the M27, which has been great to work with, and looks really nice. Even though the M3 lives in a garage, it still gets pollen, dust and cotton wood fluff all over it. I'd like to pick up one of the new detailers to use and stay ceramic to keep the beading and slickness of the #27.
    In Canada, I can easily get the ceramic detailer, but the bead booster is not available. I have ordered online for other unavailable products before, but getting stuff across the border without crazy "brokerage fees" right now is a pain. What are the differences in the two products? Is there one that works better with the #27?
    Keep your mast up and your rudder wet !!

  2. #2
    Registered Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    San Jose, Costa Rica
    Posts
    10
    Rep Power
    8

    Re: Ceramic bead booster VS Ceramic detailer

    Hi!!!
    I have tried both and right now I would say M799 leaves better slickness, but Ceramic Detailer leaves better gloss, that could be my perception... I always think the results can vary from car to car.
    Get the Ceramic Detailer for now, just to try the technology. They both have the same SiO2 technology and very similar characteristics. The dilution 1:3 makes M799 an amazing Detailer, just as G2005 Ceramic Detailer which is Ready to Use. They don

  3. #3
    Registered Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Location
    Santa Clara, CA
    Posts
    32
    Rep Power
    3

    Re: Ceramic bead booster VS Ceramic detailer

    I have both, and I found that Hybrid Ceramic Detailer was easier to use. Bead Booster (diluted 1:3 with water) is slightly more streaky so it takes just a bit more work to buff.

    However, I found that Bead Booster seems to have better beading. I'm going to guess that it's because of a higher concentration of SIO2 in the formula.

    In the end the differences are marginal to me, and you should get whatever is available to you.

  4. #4
    Product & Training Specialist Nick Winn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Irvine, CA
    Posts
    8,384
    Rep Power
    94

    Re: Ceramic bead booster VS Ceramic detailer

    I would say go for our Hybrid Ceramic Detailer, it's what you are looking for & readily available, seems to make sense to me. M799 PRO Hybrid Ceramic Bead Booster diluted at 1:3 is basically Hybrid Ceramic Detailer.
    Nick Winn
    Product & Training Specialist | Meguiar's Online Forum Administrator
    Meguiar's Inc.
    Irvine, CA
    nawinn@meguiars.com
    800-854-8073 ext 3845

    CLICK HERE TO REGISTER AS A MEMBER FOR MEGUIAR'S ONLINE DISCUSSION FORUM

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Meguiar's M799 PRO Hybrid Ceramic Bead Booster
    By Nick Winn in forum Meguiar's 2020 New Products
    Replies: 37
    Last Post: Jun 23rd, 2020, 07:48 AM
  2. Hybrid Ceramic Detailer
    By Sprzout in forum Detailing 101
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: Jun 4th, 2020, 12:45 PM
  3. Meguiar's Hybrid Ceramic Detailer
    By Nick Winn in forum Meguiar's 2020 New Products
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: May 4th, 2020, 09:43 PM
  4. Best detailer for a ceramic coated car
    By Vettefan in forum Detailing 101
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: Sep 23rd, 2019, 09:02 AM
  5. Ceramic pro
    By 335d in forum Detailing 101
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: Sep 26th, 2017, 11:03 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •